MENUMENU
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • Framework
    • Accomplishments
    • Milestones
    • Blog
  • Our Team
    • Board
    • Management
    • Consultants
  • Our Work
    • Activities
    • Innovation/Pacesetter
    • Focal Areas
      • Coordinated Specialty Care Workforce
      • Direct Support Workers
      • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
      • People in Recovery
      • Quality of Care
      • Recruitment & Retention
      • Rural Workforce
      • Substance Use Disorders
      • Supervision
  • Our Products
    • National Action Plan
    • Competencies
    • Learning Collaboratives
    • Publications
    • Reports
  • Contact Us

Quality of Care

Systems, regions of the country often lament about workforce shortages in particular sectors of healthcare.  Primary care, nurse practitioners, behavioral health (psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, counselors, nurses) are considered under-resourced, and under-integrated. But that suggests that if we only had “enough,” everything would be okay. Beneath that veneer of numbers-adequacy lie the questions of quality, improvement, training, standard of practice, and ethics.

Some hypotheticals:  IF:

  1. I live in a rural community of 70,000 people and there are very few behavioral health clinicians and those clinicians that are available have been there for a long time and there has been minimal influx of clinicians from outside of this community, how is the quality of care determined and by whom?
  2. I live in a metropolitan community of 1,000,000 people and there is an adequate supply of behavioral health clinicians but in response to what is viewed as a reaction to managed care, 40% of the senior behavioral health workforce (primarily psychiatrists and psychologists) does not accept insurance, so in essence, the area is considered a behavioral health shortage area, how is the quality of care determined and by whom?

If professional communities are inbred and the scope of the standard of practice is constricted, quality, versatility, and creativity may become limited. How does the standard of practice improve over time and by what means? What is the ethical obligation of licensed practitioners in any given state? Does board certification guarantee quality? Does continuing education guarantee quality? What is the response of the community? Of training programs? Of the state?

These are some of the issues that go beyond pure workforce numbers that the Annapolis Coalition views as important considerations.        

Join Our Newsletter

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Read Our Past Newsletters

  • Annapolis Coalition Presents Innovation Award to Pennsylvania Psychiatric Leadership Council

    The Annapolis Coalition on the Behavioral Health Workforce presented an Innovation Award to the Pennsylvania Psychiatric Leadership Council (PPLC) and its parent company, the Philadelphia Mental Health Care Corporation (PMHCC)…

    Continue Reading →
  • Inaugural National Drug Strategy Addresses Overdose Epidemic and Workforce Development

    by Michael T, Flaherty, Ph.D., Chair, Annapolis Coalition Board of Directors   In April 2022, the President and the White House Office on Drug Control Policy released their inaugural (2022)…

    Continue Reading →
  • Annapolis Coalition Reflects on BH challenges, Trends Over 20 years

    The Annapolis Coalition’s worked has spanned more than 20 years, since first coming together in 2001. Mental Health Weekly recently spoke with Michael Hoge, Ph.D., Senior Science and Policy Advisor…

    Continue Reading →

© 2023, Annapolis Coalition. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Terms & Conditions